| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130604060119.GA3265@hli22-desktop> Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:01:20 +0800 From: Haicheng Li <haicheng.li@...ux.intel.com> To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> Cc: Huajun Li <huajun.li@...el.com>, jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, huajun.li.lee@...il.com, namjae.jeon@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] Enable f2fs support inline data Hi Jaegeuk & Namjae, Sure, we'll address your comments. And this version is RFC, just wanna to make sure this feature is meaningful for f2fs project, and there is no obvious mistake, e.g. missing some critical path. And if you team has some special opensource test suites used in your daily f2fs test cycle, pls. kindly share the info with us, then we can make sure our patchset can pass these cases before we send out next version. BTW, test the kernel source tree or kernel build is a good suggestion. thanks. On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:23:57PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote: > Hi. Huajun. > > I agree jaegeuk's opinion. > Additionally, It is better that you describe the effect in change-log > when this feature is added to f2fs. > e.g. > 1. how much space is saved when storing kernel-tree(small files) ? > 2. small files creation performance test. > 3. file look-up performance test. > 4. other performance tools 's result. > > Thanks. > > 2013/6/4 Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>: > > Hi, > > > > This feature is one of my todo items. ;) > > Thank you for the contribution. > > > > Before reviewing the below code intensively, we need to check the > > following issues. > > > > - deadlock conditions > > - FS consistency > > - recovery routine > > > > Could you check one more time? > > Thanks again, > > > > 2013-06-03 (월), 18:04 +0800, Huajun Li: > >> f2fs inode is so large, small files can be stored directly in the inode, > >> rather than just storing a single block address and storing the data elsewhere. > >> > >> This RFC patch set is just to enable f2fs support inline data: files less than > >> about 3.6K can be stored directly in inode block. > >> > >> TODO: make small dirs inline too. > >> > >> > >> Haicheng Li (3): > >> f2fs: Add helper functions and flag to support inline data > >> f2fs: Add interface for inline data support > >> f2fs: add tracepoints to debug inline data operations > >> > >> Huajun Li (2): > >> f2fs: Handle inline data read and write > >> f2fs: Key functions to handle inline data > >> > >> fs/f2fs/Kconfig | 10 +++ > >> fs/f2fs/Makefile | 1 + > >> fs/f2fs/data.c | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++- > >> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 70 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> fs/f2fs/file.c | 9 ++- > >> fs/f2fs/inline.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> fs/f2fs/inode.c | 8 +++ > >> include/linux/f2fs_fs.h | 5 ++ > >> include/trace/events/f2fs.h | 69 +++++++++++++++++++ > >> 9 files changed, 402 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> create mode 100644 fs/f2fs/inline.c > >> > > > > -- > > Jaegeuk Kim > > Samsung > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists