[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140311115420.4904b7ed@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:54:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:56:23 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> Thanks, I ran an allmodconfig, and you're right, the orinoco driver
> failed to compile on v3.2-rt. I ran allmodconfig on 3.10-rt and it
> passed fine. Seems that one of the headers there pulls in swait.
>
> Looking deeper, 3.10-rt has completion as a simple-wait, and
> completion.h pulls in wait-simple.h, which is why it works there. 3.2
> does not have completions there. I wonder if I should pull in the patch
> that converts completions into swaits, and that may fix other locations
> as well.
The swait code for 3.2 can't even handle the changes that were made.
That is, the patch used swait functions not created in 3.2-rt.
I'll just revert those from 3.2-rt and be done with it.
Thanks for the report.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists