lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 02:29:13 +0000 From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com> To: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> CC: "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>, "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>, "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>, Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>, Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@....com>, "l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>, "andrew.smirnov@...il.com" <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>, "ccaione@...libre.com" <ccaione@...libre.com>, "angus@...ea.ca" <angus@...ea.ca>, "agx@...xcpu.org" <agx@...xcpu.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH V5 3/5] arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add system counter node Hi, Shawn > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 02:30:54PM +0800, Anson.Huang@....com wrote: > > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com> > > > > Add i.MX8MM system counter node to enable timer-imx-sysctr broadcast > > timer driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com> > > Do I need to wait for patch #1 landing before I apply #3 ~ #5, or can they be > applied independently (no breaking on anything)? Without #1, system can bootup, but the system counter's freq will be incorrect, although it does NOT impact normal function. So I think it is better to wait for #1 landing. @daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, can you help review the #1 patch, since I use a different way to fix the clock issue which is more simple. Anson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists