lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 23:30:52 +0000 From: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> CC: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>, "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>, "alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, "jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>, "namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Introduce perf-stat -b for BPF programs > On Dec 9, 2020, at 9:36 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote: > > Em Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:16:44AM -0800, Song Liu escreveu: >> This set introduces perf-stat -b option to count events for BPF programs. >> This is similar to bpftool-prog-profile. But perf-stat makes it much more >> flexible. >> >> Changes v2 => v3: >> 1. Small fixes in Makefile.perf and bpf_counter.c (Jiri) >> 2. Rebased on top of bpf-next. This is because 1/2 conflicts with some >> patches in bpftool/Makefile. > > Can't you split that up so that I can process the perf part and the > bpftool goes via the bpf-next tree? Actually, I can make it conflict-less, so we can route everything together. I also put the change to bpftool/Makefile in a separate patch in v4. Thanks, Song
Powered by blists - more mailing lists