linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d26d4bd8-b5e1-f4d5-b563-9bc4dd384ff8@acm.org>
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:42:02 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     trix@...hat.com, kashyap.desai@...adcom.com,
        sumit.saxena@...adcom.com, shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com, nathan@...nel.org,
        ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Cc:     megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid: cleanup formatting of megaraid

On 1/27/22 07:19, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> 
> checkpatch reports several hundred formatting errors.
> Run these files through clang-format and knock off
> some of them.

Isn't this the kind of patches that carries more risk than value? 
Additionally, this patch conflicts with a patch series that I plan to 
post soon.

Thanks,

Bart.