lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFrX1JNBio1tm4TbOwO4KSGP5ZHsLbJEXVv8qn-2Cq_KJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Sep 2023 14:16:21 +0200
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Balamanikandan Gunasundar 
        <balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com>,
        dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, hari.prasathge@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: atmel-mci: Remove preprocessor directive

On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 at 09:18, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 12:04 PM Balamanikandan Gunasundar
> <balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> > Remove the preprocessor directive IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MMC_ATMELMCI) while
> > checking if the device is compatible with atmel,hsmci. Instead handle it in
> > the if() condition. The compiler optimizes out the entire if() clause if
> > the first expression in the if() clause is constant false.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Balamanikandan Gunasundar <balamanikandan.gunasundar@...rochip.com>
> > Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>
> Thanks for tidying this up Balamanikandan!

Linus, we didn't manage to get this into v6.6. So, it's probably
better if you pick up this via your tree for v6.7.

Note that the commit message header may be a bit misleading, as this
is really a gpio patch. Maybe you can amend that when applying?

Kind regards
Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ