[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZztWzI/AYv9A8Pla@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:01:32 +0800
From: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@...el.com>
Cc: Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@...nel.org>, Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>,
linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>,
Marco Pagani <marpagan@...hat.com>,
Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...ux.intel.com>,
Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal <basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 18/19] fpga: dfl: drop unneeded get_device() and
put_device() of feature device
On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 06:37:13PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> The feature device data was originally stored as platform data, hence
> the memory allocation was tied to the lifetime of the feature device.
Good to know the reason.
Thanks,
Yilun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists