[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20241202113858.GB8562@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 12:38:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"Gautham R . Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
Perry Yuan <perry.yuan@....com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Li RongQing <lirongqing@...du.com>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:AMD PSTATE DRIVER" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/12] platform/x86: hfi: add online and offline
callback support
On Sat, Nov 30, 2024 at 08:06:58AM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> @@ -340,6 +416,11 @@ static int amd_hfi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + ret = cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN, "x86/amd_hfi:online",
> + amd_hfi_online, amd_hfi_offline);
By using online notifier, you will already have tasks running on this
CPU before you initialize the HFI bits, is that okay?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists