[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82245748-d0b6-92c7-bb43-b6d006795d74@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 15:43:33 -0700
From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rtnetlink: add support for protodown reason
On 7/27/20 1:47 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Jul 2020 12:21:17 -0700
> Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>
>> - + nla_total_size(1) /* IFLA_PROTO_DOWN */
>> + + rtnl_proto_down_size(dev) /* proto down */
> Changing the size of a netlink field is an ABI change in the kernel.
> This has the potential to break existing programs.
>
> Wouldn't it be safer to add a new link attribute for the reason
> rather than overloading the existing attribute?
yes, It does add a new attribute. Its just that I moved all protodown
attribute handling to a separate function
Powered by blists - more mailing lists