[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACYkzJ6QZek1VV-QgO52Kp9X4cCJnXaD7QJFkMtMLtzDTzDDsA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:42:54 +0200
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
To: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, hpa@...or.com,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Daniel Kiss <daniel.kiss@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
Delyan Kratunov <delyank@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 9:44 AM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/16/2022 9:57 AM, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> > On 4/16/2022 1:12 AM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
> >>> x86.
> >>>
> >>> fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
> >>> mov x9, x30
> >>> nop
> >>>
> >>> fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
> >>> mov x9, x30
> >>> bl <bpf_trampoline>
> >>>
> >>> Tested on qemu, result:
> >>> #55 fentry_fexit:OK
> >>> #56 fentry_test:OK
> >>> #58 fexit_sleep:OK
> >>> #59 fexit_stress:OK
> >>> #60 fexit_test:OK
> >>> #67 get_func_args_test:OK
> >>> #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
> >>> #101 modify_return:OK
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> Can you please also take a look at [0], which is an ongoing work to
> >> add support for BPF cookie to BPF trampoline-based BPF programs. It's
> >> very close to being done, so it would be good if you can implement
> >> that at the same time.
> >
> > OK, I'll take a look and try to implemnt it.
>
> already implemented, but there are some conflicts between these two
> series, will send v3 after trampoline cookie are merged.
Awesome work, Thanks for doing this!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists