lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 02:49:41 +0200 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf, x86: Don't mark DataLA addresses as store On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:49:43AM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote: > >> I have a problem with this patch. > >> > >> It makes: perf mem -t store rec record OP_NA for the store. > >> It was recording OP_STORE before. > >> > >> I think we need to keep LD/ST info. This is useful for analysis > >> especially if we collect loads/stores simultaneously. > >> > >> Was working before for the mem-loads, mem-stores events. > > > > Ok. Would it be enough if it only worked for "mem-stores" and not > > all PEBS events? > > > Ok, do that at a minimum. I fixed it now. However it turned out that "perf mem report" actually not report mem_op, only mem_lvl. You may want to fix that separately. -Andi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists